That beliefs about who one is and what is real are a direct cause of oneself and of one's own realities. What the #$*! Everything from the possibility of disappearing and reappearing, to the possibility of having strange new forms of communication. I started out thinking that BLEEP 2 would be a ground-breaking update covering ideas and discoveries in quantum physics, brain neurology and consciousness studies introduced over a decade ago. log out. The meditation may not have helped the victims of violent crime, but it did win Hagelin the 1994 Ig Nobel Peace Prize. He has however just released his third book of pretty crystal pictures. My main objection is to the "blessed water" segment which was utter bull****, but the rest of the movie is ok and is designed to start people . Bleep raises thought-provoking questions about science and its relationship to spirituality and metaphysics. It was really hard to sit through. subscription. Science Monitor has expired. What could be worse than being aware of every tiny detail that your brain handles from phosphate levels to heart rate and hair growth. [5], According to the makers of the film, "Bleep" is an expurgation of "fuck". Those points suggest that quantum-derived "possibilities" affect the wider world, that human thought is the ultimate arbiter of physical reality, and that by manipulating thought properly, people can achieve harmony and even shape the structure of matter. The bits and pieces of matter that make up sub-atomic particles (protons, neutrons and electrons) don't exist in any handy, measurable way unless they're interacting with one another. There's just this little matter of the science being a bit bleep. The question is, how far down the rabbit hole, do you wanna go? We will write a custom Essay on Philosophy Meaning of Arntz's Movie "What the Bleep Do We Know" specifically for you. In fact, "you are God in the making," which explains why Shirley MacLaine is a Ramtha fan. Here's an edited transcript: Cosmic Log: Every once in a while, you'll hear about something like "The Secret," or some other reference to quantum mechanics as explaining how you can change your universe, or even perhaps why it's in the realm of possibility that a globe-gobbling black hole could be created because "anything can happen" in quantum mechanics. "The protagonist, Amanda, played by Academy Award-Winning actress Marlee Matlin, finds herself in a fantastic Alice in Wonderland experience when her daily, uninspired life literally begins to unravel, revealing the uncertain world of the quantum field hidden behind what we consider to be our normal, waking reality. He has stated in several venues that his views were totally misrepresented in the film. [4], Lacking the funding and resources of the typical Hollywood film, the filmmakers relied on "guerrilla marketing" first to get the film into theaters, and then to attract audiences. At the end of this article, Dr Simons invites readers to explore the limitations of their own brains. 4. What the Bleep Do We Know!? - Rotten Tomatoes Q. On this Wikipedia the language links are at the top of the page across from the article title. Do We Know!? "Our brain receives 400 billion bits/second of information, but we're only aware of 2000 bits/second. [8], In the Publishers Weekly article, publicist Linda Rienecker of New Page Books says that she sees the success as part of a wider phenomenon, stating "A large part of the population is seeking spiritual connections, and they have the whole world to choose from now". You dont have a Christian Science Monitor You can't change the world by thinking about it. Krauss worries that a lot of people can be fooled by appeals to the admittedly weird world of quantum physics a world in which particles are said to take every possible path from point A to point B, in which the position and velocity of particles are necessarily cloaked in uncertainty, in which the mere act of observation changes the thing being observed. What Does The Movie "What The Bleep Do We Know" Mean? | Teaching of Bleep was conceived and its production funded by William Arntz, who co-directed the film along with Betsy Chasse and Mark Vicente; all three were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. Interspersed with Amanda's woes and the pseudoscience are random attacks on organized religion. "The theory can't predict with precision what will happen, but it knows everything that can happen and it will tell you the probability of all these things happening.". Beliefnet is a lifestyle website providing feature editorial content around the topics of inspiration, spirituality, health, wellness, love and family, news and entertainment. It's there. Several books have been written about the film's remarkable grassroots marketing campaign, which led to its unprecedented success. That matter is not solid, and electrons are able to pop in and out of existence without it being known where they disappear to. You can't bring good things to you by thinking about them. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser. "What the Bleep Do We Know," a pseudoscientific docudrama that purports to link quantum mechanics and consciousness, would be a riot if people didn't take it so seriously. you are agreeing to our, One month free trial to theMonitorDaily, Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor, Performance of quantum computer no better than ordinary PC, say analysts, 'Spooky' physics: How quantum entanglement could link wormholes, Quantum 'teleportation' distance record broken. It's hard to say where Candace Pert got the low-down on what the Native American Indians did or didn't see when Columbus and the gang hit the horizon. And in fact we can make weird quantum phenomena happen. 2. There's nothing wrong with that. As the Amanda plot zooms here and there, a host of dubious evidence is marshaled to convince us that life is all about mind over matter. Some movies are so bad, they're funny. Neither of them convincingly achieve this. The film has been described as an example of quantum mysticism, and has been criticized for both misrepresenting science and containing pseudoscience. If anyone has any information to refute any of the facts laid out here, I will be more then willing to retract them. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for What the Bleep Do We Know? Around 650 million people watched the moment on television. Interviews with scientists and authors, animated bits, and a storyline involving a deaf photographer are used in this docudrama to illustrate the link between quantum mechanics, neurobiology, human consciousness and day-to-day reality. Unfortunately, it also completely misunderstands it. (2005)", "Cult Science Dressing Up Mysticism as Quantum Physics", "The New Age Spiritualist and the Old School Scholars", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=What_the_Bleep_Do_We_Know!%3F&oldid=1139210194, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0, That the universe is best seen as constructed from thoughts and ideas rather than from. [5] Foreign gross added another $5 million for a worldwide gross of nearly $16 million. Sensitive Water--Science or Fantasy? - Beliefnet As one of the film's characters gushes early in the proceedings, 'The moment we acknowledge the quantum self, we say that somebody has become enlightened'. What the Bleep Do We Know? DVD (2005) Marlee Matlin, Arntz (DIR - eBay This will be revisited if any. is god-awful. (Refugees in Sudan or people in Baghdad would have an even tougher time accepting the film's premise.). If you have questions about your account, please I mean listen, you have very reputable individuals who believe in validation, as experimental proof. 16 Quotes From the Movies ideas - Pinterest That's why we experience a classical world. Amanda is a divorced woman who makes a living as a photographer. Review of the What the Bleep Do We Know? - Christian Research Institute We hear more and more from JZ Knight, a woman channeling the ancient warrior Ramtha, a chap who (through Knight) incidentally leads the Ramtha School of Enlightenment. 3. What the Bleep Do We Know!? Occasionally recalling a physics lesson, an acid trip, and a lost afternoon at a New Age bookstore, What The BLEEP Do We Know?! The film "What the Bleep Do We Know?!" is a book of amazing science, and now the international bestselling book is available in paperback. A lot of the propaganda from them was hilarious, especially whenever candidates attempted to hold public speeches and performing demonstrations of yogic flying. 1. But we behave like classical objects for a reason: We're big, we have lots of particles, they interact. But above a tiny size range, quantum properties collapse, and particles start to behave in the way described by classical physics - more like bowling balls than fuzzy clouds of "wave functions. They are relevant because of the deliberateness on the part of the film makers to keep certain facts unknown (ironically, it is I making the unknown know) and misrepresent others. Amanda is a photographer, who seems to be highly skilled but not very successful professionally. There was some sort of plot involving a woman photographer (played by Marlee Matlin), who wanders around and has anxiety attacks. Hard to get your head around What the Bleep Do We Know. But this only applies to sub-atomic particles a rock doesn't need you to bump into it to exist. But are there new, weird applications that people might see that have an impact on everyday life, beyond the woo-woo? Film / What the #$*! A group of 3 Indian people claiming to be direct disciples of Maharishi Mahesh-Yogi visited our high school. Even followers of spiritual traditions that believe in worldly illusion will have problems with "Bleep." Next factoid: Crime in Washington, D.C. was reduced 25 percent by prayer--and made believers of the D.C. cops! !" is a radical departure from convention. As the movie did, this book compels listeners to ask themselves Gre. Remembering The Isheagu Massacre Of May 1968 - Politics - Nigeria yeago works Blog Archive Jesus, Buddha, Ken Wilber?? If you want to affect something in the external world, you have to do something to it. What the Bleep Do We Know!? | Bleep 2 - The Prodigal Movie A: Absolutely. Q: But isn't everything really connected? http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith (accessed: April 20, 2009)A note about Fred Wolf's qualifications: He has a Ph.D in Theoretical Physics from UCLA in 1963, although he has not worked in laboratory endeavours since that time. I guess the difference between me and those other people is that I actually have some grasp on the concepts that the movie was trying to talk about. With researchers and theoretical scientists leading the way, it takes the reader through the looking glass of quantum physics into a universe that is more bizarre and alive than ever imagined. You are free to comment as you wish. [6], The Institute of Noetic Sciences, a New Age research organization that "explores phenomena that do not necessarily fit conventional scientific models", has supported What the Bleep Do We Know!? It sounds reasonable, and familiar. "Bleep" of faith | Salon.com In the movie What the Bleep Do We Know?, physicists, biologists and the occasional chiropractor tell us how quantum physics and neuroscience support their views on consciousness. DO WE KNOW? He claims the drop was achieved. There were many more, but I will leave them for others. 2) "What the Bleep Do We Know" has sure got a lot of people talking and thinking. Seven Times Planet TV Studios Went Way Too Far: ReportWire.org info@planettvstudios.com nicholas@planettvstudios.com Eric@planettvstudios.com Julie@planettvstudios.com Website YouTube Channel Facebook Twitter Instagram Planet TV Studios LHTV LLC Sol. According to Joo Magueijo, professor in theoretical physics at Imperial College, the film deliberately misquotes science. D (k)ow!? What the #$*! Do We (K)now!? (2004) - IMDb One of the scientists interviewed is John Hagelin who, besides being part of the TM cult surrounding Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, presidential candidate of the Natural Law Party, and Minister of Science and Technology of the Global Country of World Peace is a rather prominent particle theorist. What the Bleep Do We Know!? Ramtha - JZ Knight - The Skeptic's Dictionary - Skepdic.com So does classical physics. They were spreading their methods of meditation but that was not the main thing that impressed me. ", Critics offered mixed reviews as seen on the film review website Rotten Tomatoes, where it scored a "Rotten" 34% score with an average score of 4.6/10, based on 77 reviews. Some lost their entire life savings. Thanks to Pylon Sentinel for pointing this out.A link to his Wikipedia page is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Alan_Wolf Quantum mechanics may play a role at some level in the way the brain works just as it may play a role in photosynthesis. Has this experiment been replicated or verified? Im not personally familiar with any of Hagelins work but Im sure theres some good physics in there. Also, the movie suggests that the quantum idea of matter embracing all its possible states at once applies to the larger world of people and rocks. That movie started its life as a small documentary about Spirit and Science, but grew in scope (and budget) and became What the BLEEP Do We Know!? Consciousness must be involved. Hagelin was a grad student at Harvard when I was an undergrad and I met him when we were in the same quantum field theory class. You are free to comment as you wish. Watch What The Bleep Do We Know?! | Prime Video - amazon.com Quantum physics tells us that reality isn't fixed subatomic particles only come into existence when they are observed and 2. We believe news can and should expand a sense of identity and possibility beyond narrow conventional expectations. Quantum physics tells us that reality isn't fixed subatomic particles only come into existence when they are observed, 2. "[20], Journalist John Gorenfeld, writing in Salon, notes that the film's three directors are students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment, which he says has been described as a cult. Our mind has enormous potential, but we only use a small part of it for conscious thought, and we miss a lot of what's going on around us so, in a leap of creatively edited logic 3. To accomplish that, you would have to invoke "new physics," Dr. Schumm says, in which the explanation can be verified or falsified through experiment. It is just a movie. Our work isn't possible without your support. The narrative follows a fictional photographer, Amanda, through her emotional and existential journey of life. 3. Nobody does.". We don't know which way it's going to go. But it's quite a leap to say the brain doesn't know the difference between vision and memory. Down The Rabbit Hole\". Moreover, the movie proposes no plausible physical mechanism by which thoughts influence matter. What tH LP D (k)ow!? - RationalWiki And we are certainly not isolated from the rest of the world. Reality is happening in our brain all the time we're receiving it but it's not being integrated." One possible answer: they go to an alternative universe where people are asking the same question: 'where'd they go?'" They're coming into the marketplace hungry for direction, but they don't want some person who claims to have all the answers. "Quantum physics calculates only possibilities Who/what chooses among these possibilities to bring the actual event of experience? So when you hear about quantum mechanics and devices, you can say, "OK, that sounds reasonable." This is one reason physicists studying a subatomic particle create large numbers of them in particle accelerators. . Tags: science-and-technology, neuroscience, physics. William Arntz has referred to the film as "WTFDWK" in a message to the film's street team. And wait-the human body is mostly water! But I assume that's not quite right, and that sometimes quantum mechanics' name is taken in vain. While many of its interviewees and subjects are professional scientists in the fields of physics, chemistry, and biology, one of them has noted that the film quotes him out of context. The quantum world does pervade everything around us, but as Richard Feynman liked to say, "Scientific creativity is imagination in a straitjacket." It's truly amazing that you can separate two elementary particles that were originally tied together, and often make a measurement of one particle that instantly affects the other, even if it's on Alpha Centauri. and published a study guide. What the (Bleep) Were They Thinking? - Skeptico The film's central point--that reality is a construct of our own brains--seems rife with intriguing cinematic possibilities. does a reasonable job of presenting some of these quandaries, researchers say. The following persons in the film have all spoken at RSE and sold books there. IE 11 is not supported. 6. It's actually the machine that's the observer, not the human who's jotting down results. Extreme quantum mechanics could be the name of the speciality of SF writer (and physicist) Greg Egan. Even skeptics concede that we humans can fall into destructive thought patterns and need to cleanse our vision of what's real. Gripping stuff, but nothing to do with our daily lives. ( ) - What the bleep Do we know If quantum physics baffled the late Dr. Feynman, one of its most brilliant explorers, then no one should feel embarrassed for failing to understand the subject. I don't know how many times I've heard people say, "Oh, I love quantum mechanics because I'm really into meditation, or I love the spiritual benefits that it brings me." It demands a freedom of view and greatness of thought so far unknown, indeed, not even dreamed of since Copernicus. Nasa found something. Your session to The Christian If COVID-19 mRNA is safe where are the libel lawsuits by Pharma? The plot follows the fictional story of a photographer, using documentary-style interviews and computer-animated graphics, as she encounters emotional and existential obstacles in her life and begins to consider the idea that individual and group consciousness can influence the material world. During our current Covid19 pandemic, this collection is highly relevant to a world still seeking novel answers to the human condition and also drawn to old theories long ago debunked. As a series of scientists and scientist types take a wayward stab at explaining quantum theory -- it seems to involve being in two places at once -- "What the Bleep," which opens nationwide today . Fred Allen Wolf Check my single page unpublishable http://dftuz.unizar.es/~rivero/research/simple.pdf. With Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, Barry Newman, Armin Shimerman. Columbus certainly didn't speak the language, and the locals didn't keep written records. Krauss has dealt with factual and fictional weirdness for decades as the author of "The Physics of Star Trek," as the head of Arizona State University's Origins Project, and as the author of a "Quantum Man," a soon-to-be-published biography of pioneering physicist Richard Feynman. - Dr. Real news, real hope. I think its a good idea for people to consider the example of Hagelin: hes completely delusional and has zero common sense, but able to function at a high level in the particle theory community. Right after the Velvet Revolution in 1989 (the collapse of the Czechoslovak communism), many new spiritual and other directions were trying to find their ways to the new free countries. [13] The American Chemical Society's review criticizes the film as a "pseudoscientific docudrama", saying "Among the more outlandish assertions are that people can travel backward in time, and that matter is actually thought. A moderately low-budget independent film, it was promoted using viral marketing methods and opened in art-house theaters in the western United States, winning several independent film awards before being picked up by a major distributor and eventually grossing over $10 million. Hagelin might be crazy, but some of those papers are co-written by John Ellis and other respectable people. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); document.getElementById( "ak_js_2" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); WatchDocumentaries.com | Games | Quizzes | Contact |Privacy & Terms | Manage Cookies |Advertise | DMCA, Aleister Crowley: The Wickedest Man in the World. Present thinking on neurology and addiction are covered in some detail but,. How quantum physicists 'review' the 'Bleep' movie to someone you know:
It's used as an excuse to be even weirder. "I create my own reality, says quantum physics," intones one expert, and the viewer could be lured to accept this as proof. kazakore (kazakore) January 14, 2010, 6:30pm #10 While Amanda waits for a commuter train, she (and we) are shown the work of Japanese scientist Masaru Emoto, who has photographed water after exposing it to different emotions. Do We (K)now!? As he told ABC's "This Week" the day after the debate: "When it . unless you renew or In addition to the films three directors, there were actors and others involved in the production who are long time "students" of Ramthas' School of enlightenment. Thorough debunking of that shlock "What The Bleep Do We Know?" - Yelp Q: Why do you think that people have seized upon this? Both are indeed mysterious, and their genuine mystery needs none of the hype with which this film relentlessly and noisily belabours us", concluding that the film is "tosh". (It's all to do with photons of light from your measuring instrument hitting the poor electron and knocking it for six). 7. Then we segue to a narrative starring Amanda (Marlee Maitlin), a wedding photographer who's bummed because her slimy husband cheated on her. PDF Hidden Messages In Water based on this subject nature contained, I hold these 2 films in a very high regard. It demands a freedom of view and greatness of thought so far unknown, indeed, not even dreamed of since Copernicus. The movie contains interviews from such leaders in their fields as: Candace. If it were manifest, you could run at a wall a lot of times, and every now and then you'd spontaneously appear on the other side of the wall. This is the first coronavirus vaccine approved by the FDA, and is expected to open the door to more vaccine mandates. In the late eighties I remember seeing Maharishi University preprints, perhaps about flipped SU(5). In addition, the film mentioned clipper ships which were not even in existence at that time. In a corrupt, greed-fueled world, a powerful alchemist leads a Christ-like character and seven materialistic figures to the Holy Mountain,. We're such a shallow people. 3. What The Bleep!? Down The Rabbit Hole | Documentary Heaven It was an interesting idea aiming to solve the hierachy problem, as announced. We want to bridge divides to reach everyone. (I haven't). Staff meetings are tedious enough give me a conscious mind with a decent filter device any day. All the weirdness of quantum mechanics gets washed out on the scale that we can experience. A moment in which 'the mathematical formalisms of quantum mechanics [] are stripped of all empirical content and reduced to a set of syrupy nostrums'. He even called in to a radio program the director was on to discuss this and was cut off. Perhaps that is why they couldnt see them. Initially, the film was released in only two theaters: one in Yelm, Washington (the home of the producers, which is also the home of Ramtha), and the other the Bagdad Theater in Portland, Oregon, where it was filmed. Is this a hoax to promote positivity? No, that wasnt intended specifically as an attack on supersymmetric models; the fact that Hagelin worked on them isnt an argument for or against them. Update: More information at the end of the video description.Comment approval now removed. Adapted from "Ask the Everyday Scientist" with permission of the writer. The brain wasn't born yesterday. I remember Hagelin wanting to discuss how quantum field theory could explain how TMers were able to levitate, something about how they did this by changing the position of the pole in the propagator. Its true that Hagelin stopped doing physics in the mid-nineties to concentrate on his other nonsense, but I can vouch for the fact that as early as 1978-9 he was heavily involved in TM and thought it had a lot to do with QFT. extended versions of What the BLEEP Do We Know! and What the #$*! ", "What the Bleep Do We Know!? While the (probabilistic) predictions of quantum mechanics are, as far . [12][13] Lisa Randall refers to the film as "the bane of scientists". The only problem with Andrew Newberg's statement is that it suggests our subconscious brains are doing really interesting stuff and we're somehow missing out; if only we could harness that other zillion gigabits or so we'd be masters of our destinies. The part where the scientist put water under a microscope that was sitting under the label "I hate you" or "I want to kill you" Looked distorted and dirty but water blessed by monks was uniform and beautiful. "What the Bleep Do We Know," as it is referred to for convenience, is not a conventional documentary about quantum physics. It's more like a collision in the editing room between talking heads, an impenetrable human parable and a hallucinogenic animated cartoon. Some credible researchers appear, including neurologist Andrew Newberg and physicist David Albert (Albert has since disassociated himself from the film, saying his views were misrepresented). Despite his caveats, he recommends that people see the film, stating: "I hope it develops into a cult movie in the UK as it has in the US. Quantum mechanics is a replacement for the phrase "anything goes." As the sample size grows, so does the scientist's confidence in the statistical inferences drawn from the large sample. These photos may well be art they're sure as hell not science. On the whole they were a bunch of complete flakes, although one of them (David Albert) is a philosopher of science here at Columbia. There are lots of things in quantum mechanics that sound like magic. Moreover, assume that they want your money. The comments focus primarily on a single theme: "We create our own reality." Amit Gotswami Critical Analysis of 'What The Bleep Do We Know' Part 1 But when you hear about quantum mechanics and consciousness, you should assume the author is a crackpot unless proven otherwise. Marlee Matlin, Barry Newman, Elaine Hendrix. WHAT THE BLEEP DO WE KNOW?! - American Chemical Society She's averse to churches (she married her husband in one, so they must be bad!